On Thursday, February 21, 2013 07:12:34, ROGERS Richard M wrote:
> > From: exim-users-bounces+richard.rogers=staffs.ac.uk@???
> > [mailto:exim-users-bounces+richard.rogers=staffs.ac.uk@exim.org] On
> > Behalf Of Cyborg
> > Sent: 21 February 2013 11:57
> > To: exim-users@???
> > Subject: Re: [exim] forany() with multiply recipients
> >
> > Am 21.02.2013 12:18, schrieb ROGERS Richard M:
> > > We have a case a bit like this here, where individuals can set their
> > > own
> >
> > preferences/whitelist/blacklist, so handling can change even within the
> > one domain.
> >
> > > The way we deal with it is to set the message handling according to the
> > > first
> >
> > recipient's preference; then if the handling is different for later ones
> > they get a 4xx (temporary rejection). It introduces some delays but
> > everyone gets the message handling they want.
> >
> > > Regards
> >
> > out of curiosity .. how does sending a 4XX help with a logic decision
> > with opposite outcomes ?
>
> I'm not entirely sure I understand the question - but the point of the
> approach is that only one set of preferences can be applied to an accepted
> message.
This also happens with per-user SpamAssassin settings. For instance in the
instructions below in A.10.3.1 the suggestion is to only accept one recipient
per message in order to apply the correct user preferences on each message.
This causes a retry for every local recipient of the message past the first
one. :-(
https://www.redhat.com/mirrors/LDP/HOWTO/Spam-Filtering-for-MX/exim-sa.html
If someone knows a way to have Exim go through the delivery ACL rules for each
recipient, I'd like to know.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
Chris.Knadle@???
