Re: [exim-dev] Possible runtest fix?

On 2012-05-22 at 09:05 -0700, Todd Lyons wrote:
> I have Ubuntu and it uses a version of 'ls' that causes test 345 to
> fail. Is the following addition to runtest too hackish or is it ok to
> commit?

Does setting LC_ALL=C in the environment before invoking runtest fix
things?

I wonder if runtest should simply do:
$ENV{'LC_ALL'} = 'C';
at startup?

-Phil