Autore: Phil Pennock Data: To: Jeremy Harris CC: exim-dev Oggetto: Re: [exim-dev] [exim] Exim 4.80 RC2 uploaded
On 2012-05-19 at 23:43 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote: > On 2012-05-19 23:34, Phil Pennock wrote:
> > On 2012-05-19 at 23:28 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> >> - s/X=TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256/X=TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256/g;
> >> + s/TLS1.[012]:(DHE_)?RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA(1|256):256/TLS1.x:xxxxRSA_AES_256_CBC_SHAnnn:256/g;
> [...]
> > Is it necessary to drop the X= ? There were other instances where this
> > was needed?
>
> Yes, the same canonicalisation is needed for a (Received ?) header.
*sigh* Well, the text suite is not part of the release, merely run for
the release, so feel free to make whatever changes you think best here.
As long as it still runs on my GnuTLS 2.12.x and 2.10.x test boxes I'll
be happy.
