Re: [exim-dev] [exim] Exim 4.80 RC2 uploaded

On 2012-05-19 23:34, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2012-05-19 at 23:28 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>> - s/X=TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256/X=TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256/g;
>> + s/TLS1.[012]:(DHE_)?RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA(1|256):256/TLS1.x:xxxxRSA_AES_256_CBC_SHAnnn:256/g;
[...]
> Is it necessary to drop the X= ? There were other instances where this
> was needed?

Yes, the same canonicalisation is needed for a (Received ?) header.
--
Jeremy