--On 18 August 2009 19:36:09 +1000 Richard Salts <exim@???>
wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:43:20 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>> On fredagen den 15 maj 2009, Richard Salts wrote:
> [snip]
>> I just have to point out again that if a message is forwarded to your
> server,
>> that forwarding should have been configured by the recipient himself, or
>> at least with his knowledge, so, theoretically at least, it should be
>> possible for you to make exceptions for such forwarding.
> That's assuming that the user's mail administrator has set up some way in
> which the user is able to whitelist the forwarding server.
>>
>> It's really not that SPF breaks forwarding, it's that the assumption
>> that forwarding should work that is broken to begin with.
> I find forwarding to be a useful feature, and I see no reason that
> forwarded messages should be treated as second class citizens.
>>
It's this: the forwarder is asked to take responsibility for email that
they have no control over.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
