On tisdagen den 30 juni 2009, Tom Kistner wrote:
> Rick Cooper wrote:
> > Is there any work being done, or a patch available, to allow signing both
> > DKIM and DomainKeys without sending a message through exim twice?
>
> The situation right now is a bit confusing.
>
> I had added concurrent Domainkeys (via libdomainkeys) and DKIM (via
> libdkim) signing support in CVS after the 4.69 release. That code was
> never released, but some people run a snapshot of it.
>
> DKIM verification support was oddly implemented, and the library I used
> had some limitations at that time. It also brought in additional
> build-time dependencies (lstdc++, openssl).
>
> So I wrote my own DKIM implementation [1] which is dependency-free and
> portable even to non-posix platforms like Windows. Similar to how pcre
> was handled, a copy is included in the Exim source, so Exim can have
> DKIM support by default on its supported platforms (I didn't try them
> all of course ...).
Oh. I guess I'll package it for Debian ASAP then.
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
