Marc Perkel wrote:
>
> Mike Cardwell wrote:
>> Marc Perkel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Not spammers - forgers. Providing a way to defeat an anti-forgery
>>>> mechanism wouldn't be my choice. But hey, if that's what you want....
>>>>
>>> I'm thinking that forgers would be less of a problem that false
>>> positives produced by forwarded email.
>>>
>> I'm thinking the opposite.
>>
>
> Then you would merely NOT use the feature and I would.
>
Marc,
While 'bending' tools into unanticipated usage, here then, is a link to
what should make a far more comfortable toilet-seat than the ones Home
Depot sell:
http://www.antiquemystique.com/pages/8034_jpg.htm
Mind - it could be a bit of a chore to clean up afterwards.
So too, with a bastardized spf...
Bill
