Re: [exim] SPF Feature - Walk Received header

Marc Perkel wrote:

>> Not spammers - forgers. Providing a way to defeat an anti-forgery
>> mechanism wouldn't be my choice. But hey, if that's what you want....
>
> I'm thinking that forgers would be less of a problem that false
> positives produced by forwarded email.

I'm thinking the opposite.

--
Mike Cardwell
(https://secure.grepular.com/) (http://perlcv.com/)