Re: [exim] Disable retry Q

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Mr David Robertson
Date:  
To: W B Hacker
CC: exim users
Subject: Re: [exim] Disable retry Q
Hi Bill,

Thanks for the advice.

The reason for not wanting to use retry rules is that I am having write
lock errors on the retry database when the server is busy. There seams
to be no solution to this problem other than slowing the message queue
down which I do not want to do.

All mail that fails to deliver on this server is failed over to a slow
queue on a fallback_host. So there is no real reason to have retry
rules in operation on this server.

I have a script in place that deals with the very rare occasions when
mail gets stuck in the queue so this is not a problem.

Regards

David

W B Hacker wrote:
> Mr David Robertson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any way of disabling exim retry rules?
>> I do not want to use retry but rules I have configured the routers to
>> judge if a mail is to old.
>>
>> condition = "${if and {{ >{$message_age}{8600}}{
>> match{$received_ip_address}{192.168.1.1}}}}"
>>
>> I know that * * in a retry rule will cause mail to be bounced on the
>> second attempt but this is not quite what I want.
>> Mail should stay on the queue until it has passed a time out set in the
>> router.
>> Basically I just want to bypass exims own retry logic and use my own.
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> David
>>
>
> Short answer: Never tried totally disabling them, so don't really know.
>
> Longer answer: Should be dirt-simple to set the retry times to such
> loooong intervals, even for the initial go, that your custom router
> essentially 'always' beats them to the punch.
>
> Which might leave a number of 'retry timeout not reached...' in the
> logs, but should be safe enough for proof-of-concept.
>
> Perhaps more than safe if the 'long' timeout is not grossly longer than
> whatever you figure is reasonable for your router to have done the job
> if it *could* do it, as it would serve as a fail-safe that still took
> advantage of Exim's 'final disposition' mechanism for things that cannot
> *ever* be delivered.
>
> Which your router probably does not do....
>
> ... and leads me back to preferring to JF Adjust the retry rules, AND
> NOT re-invent that particular wheel WITH the associated axle it turns
> on, brakes, steering, tires.... etc.
>
> HTH,
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.4/1976 - Release Date: 02/27/09 13:27:00
>