Marcin Krol wrote:
> Peter Bowyer wrote:
>>> This header is readily added by spamc. Frankly, spamc or other
>>> external script/client is a proper place to generate this kind of
>>> information.
>>
>> Can you not make SA do exactly this with the X-Spam-Report header and
>> suitable options under 'header' in SA local.cf?
>
> Sure. Except
>
> 1. as I explained in another mail, I actually need both headers
> (short spam report for user filtering on that and detailed rule
> scoring - for diagnosing spams that got through and finetuning SA
> later), and spamc does all that by default, so why reinvent the
> wheel?
>
> 2. One could *reasonably* might want to do smth else with thos mails
> (say, developing custom spam filter or plugging in something
> different than SA altogether), and scanning the "old way" (by sending
> mail to a "spamcheck" transport, scanning and reinjecting it with
> Exim) does not allow doing it at SMTP time.
>
> Scanning with external program runnable from ACL is the most
> straightforward, and IMHO the best way of dealing with it. Hence my
> (original) question.
>
> Regards,
> Marcin Krol
Have you tried sa-exim? I think it will do everything you want. (Saying
that, I'm not sure what its status is as
http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html gives me a 403 error.
However, I got an RPM from another site that is working fine with Exim
4.62)
Regards
Richard
--
Richard Rogers
IT Development and Innovation Manager
Information Services, Staffordshire University
The information in this email is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, except for the purpose of delivery to the addressee, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Kindly notify the sender and delete the message and any attachment from your computer.
