In message <4909A321.9010503@???>, neil <neil@???>
writes
> I've been trying to stop these bank phishing mails.
most anti-spam systems eat them for breakfast
>Rather than trying
>to get the banks to implement DK, DKIM or SPF so I can check against
>that, I have the snippet below.
>
>I was wondering if this is of any use to anyone else or if it could be
>made better.
this all rather depends whether your users forward bank email from
somewhere else to you; and indeed whether you believe that the banks
will tell you when they change email sending architecture...
>I've checked the list and cant see anything similar.
... I expect people most people let their spam filters deal with
phishing (and of course their generic anti-spam systems -- such as
assessing the reputation of the sender and their HELO).
>cat /usr/exim/banks
>
>#abbey.co.uk
>#abbeynational.co.uk
>#abbey.com
>alliance-leicester.co.uk
>americanexpress.com
>#barclays.com
>barclays.co.uk
>egg.com
>halifax.co.uk
>#hsbc.co.uk
>hsbc.com
>#lloydstsb.co.uk
>lloydstsb.com
>#natwest.com
>#natwest.co.uk
>#nwolb.com
>paypal.com
>rbs.com
>#rbs.co.uk
>#rbsdigital.com
>#rbsdigital.co.uk
>#sainsburysonline.com
>#ybonline.co.uk
what about these (from my list of recent phishing victims, and there are
many more banks and building societies than have been attacked):
Bank of Scotland (UK)
Barclaycard (UK)
Birmingham Midshires (UK)
Bradford & Bingley (UK)
Cahoot (UK)
Cater Allen (UK)
CitiBank (UK)
Clydesdale (UK)
Co-operative Bank (UK)
Coutts (UK)
Coventry BS (UK)
First Direct (UK)
HM Revenue & Customs (UK)
Intelligent Finance (UK)
MBNA Europe (UK)
Nationwide (UK)
Norwich & Peterborough BS (UK)
O2 (UK)
Scottish Widows (UK)
Smile (UK)
Tesco (UK)
Ulster Bank (UK)
Woolwich (UK)
Yorkshire Bank (UK)
- --
richard Richard Clayton
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
