On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:22 +0200, Michael Haardt wrote:
> > The migration is easy enough -- we have a git tree which is following
> > the CVS tree automatically; all we have to do is stop committing to CVS
> > and start committing to the git version.
>
> At the current rate of acticity, why bother changing? If you still do,
> please write a step by step documentation that explains how to checkout
> the sources and commit changes for this particular installation. Keep it
> easy for occasional developers to commit changes.
Nothing really changes but the command names, cf.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/everyday.html#Individual%20Developer%20(Participant)
Larger changes, of course, would be done differently in other trees etc.
and not committed to the "central" tree.
johannes