Author: Phil Pennock Date: To: Patryk R. CC: Exim-users Subject: Re: [exim] Vacation replies only to chosen addresses
On 2008-04-17 at 10:37 +0200, Patryk R. wrote: > Awesome, thanks for this reply. Just one final question, if I got this right, in contrary
> to ACLs there's no "invisible deny all" at the end, so if I wanted one address allowed and
> all denied, does this make sense:
>
> senders = my@??? : !*
Note that "address.com" is a domain registered to "WhitePages.com, Inc";
the gTLD registries reserve "example" for examples.
The !* is not needed. Without it, the last item is a positive
constraint, therefore the default is that an item is not present.
10.2 Negated items in lists
> Also, will the !* match the blank sender address as well? (If yes, then I could get rid of
> that extra condition.)
10.19 Address lists
describes matching the empty sender.
The best way to find out if !* matches is to try it. Exim has rather
good facilities for an administrator to ask it questions about how
something would be interpreted.
So the empty address doesn't match the * in !*, since otherwise it would
be a "nope"; instead, because the last item in the list is negative,
something not matching anything in the list yields a match (section
10.2, referenced above, explains this).