Hi all,
A clarification on ACLs
Specificly the acl_check_rcpt
I have been pouring through the documentation for quite a while now, and two questions that I cant seem to get my head around are:
1. When a message is Accepted, is it really just sent to the next part of the acl or is acl processing stopped and the message is sent to the top of the Routers....
2. What is the default action of the acl list, accept or deny? (i.e. if a message goes completely though the acl and is niether accepted or denied, is it accepted by default at the end of the ACL?
-GrantFrom tom@??? Wed Apr 02 13:46:18 2008
Envelope-to: exim-users@???
Received: from whizbang.eurescom.eu ([2001:6f8:1118::1]:56529
helotp.eurescom.eu) by tahini.csx.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <tom@???>) id 1Jh2M6-0003JJ-74
for exim-users@???; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:46:18 +0100
Received: from [2001:6f8:1118:0:7c12:63e8:f592:34eb]
by smtp.eurescom.eu with esmtpa (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <tom@???>)
id 1Jh2M3-0002S1-PH; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:46:15 +0200
Message-ID: <47F38000.2090009@???>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:45:52 +0200
From: Tom Kistner <tom@???>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@???>
References: <94136a2c0804012234k62a916b4uad3988bd256bf890@???>
<47F32E12.20400@???> <47F33FCC.5000608@???>
<991123400804020435s2cea448bh2dfcdb34367635c7@???>
<47F37404.5040502@???>
<991123400804020526t4e8e74c9oedf226fef5df44f0@???>
In-Reply-To: <991123400804020526t4e8e74c9oedf226fef5df44f0@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charsetãO-8859-1; format\owed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Spam-Status: No, scoreÑ.4 required~0 tests÷LÐ.092, BAYES_00Ñ.5,
DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE.2,
NO_RELAYSÐ.001 autolearnO version^1.8
Cc: exim users <exim-users@???>,
Zbigniew Szalbot <zbigniew@???>
Subject: Re: [exim] DKIM - signing mail
X-BeenThere: exim-users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7
Precedence: list
List-Id: A user list for the exim MTA <exim-users.exim.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users>,
<mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subject¾subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.exim.org/lurker/list/exim-users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:exim-users@exim.org>
List-Help: <mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subjectlp>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users>,
<mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subject¥bscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:46:19 -0000
Odhiambo Washington schrieb:
> [wash@spamfilter ~/Administration/DKIM/libdkim-1.0.16-tk/src]$ openssl version
> OpenSSL 0.9.7e-p1 25 Oct 2004
This is even older than what I saw on Renaud's OpenBSD :)
Check OpenSSLs evp.h header for the EVP_sha256 declaration, and check if
it is armored with odd #ifdefs (or if it does exists at all).
> In FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE where there is no failure, the openssl version is 0.9.8e.
That puts my mind at ease :)
/tom
