Hi Phil,
+ everyone else who has tried to help, thansk a lot for your interest in
the issue and the info.
Currently Im stuck on another issue and will come back to look at this asap,
Ill post to the list
if I find a solution,
cheers Andy.!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Pennock" <exim-users@???>
To: "Andy Smith" <a.smith@???>
Cc: <exim-users@???>
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 3:02 AM
Subject: Re: [exim] Using smartrelay getting unrouteable address error
> On 2008-02-02 at 11:42 +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
>> yeah appologies, I did mangle the email address I posted, good to know
>> this is done automatically by the list
>> and in any future messages I may post Ill will not mess with the
>> information. Domian.net isnt the domain I was
>> attempting to email, and the address is valid cos as mentioned when I sub
>> in
>> an exim config from another system
>> I can deliver mail without problems.
>
> Without knowing the real domain, we can't do things to sanity-check our
> understanding of the problem and give good responses. For instance, the
> error message you gave is identical to the one you'd get for a domain
> which doesn't have MX/A records in DNS: Unrouteable address.
>
> You have to know a lot about the problem space to know when it's safe to
> obfuscate and accept that there are many people who won't answer a
> question, on principal, even in those cases. I say this as someone who
> sometimes obfuscates. ;^)
>
>> Taking a step back from my specific problem, can I just check that Im my
>> thinking is actually ok on the subject of
>> smartrelay pls?
>> My understanding of this option under sendmail is that it allows any mail
>> not local to the localhost to be
>> automatically relied to a named SMTP server (actually not smart at all,
>> but
>> a dumb forward regardless
>> of the destination). Im imagining that smartrelay will function more or
>> less
>> the same in EXIM, am I wrong?
>
> You are not wrong. And the idea is that the relay, or remote host, is
> the one with the "smarts", so it's a smarthost.
>
> But you have nothing which looks to me like a smarthost Router.
>
> smarthost:
> driver = manualroute
> domains = ! +local_domains
> transport = remote_smtp
> route_data = my.smarthost.tld
>
> It's that simple. You manually route, supplying route_data of the
> remote hostname, using your normal remote SMTP transport; you don't do
> this for domains which you handle locally. Put this first, or after any
> specially-handled remote domains.
>
> You very probably can also add "no_more" to that, so that if it's not a
> local domain then no other routers will be tried, and so avoid even
> trying any other Routers. If you want to make it more robust, you can
> decorate it with "ignore_target_hosts" and bad IP address space (see the
> default configuration for an example) and if you're sure that _all_
> addresses for any remote domain will use the same smarthost router
> (almost certainly the case) then you can also add
> "same_domain_copy_routing", which is an optimisation.
>
> -Phil
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.16/1250 - Release Date:
> 29/01/2008 22:20
>
