Re: [exim] increase in smtp concurrency

--On 7 September 2007 17:47:45 +0100 Graeme Fowler <graeme@???>
wrote:

>
> Only one of the above is related to spam.
>
> You *cannot* assume that a failure to send QUIT means a given session
> has transmitted spam, you really can't. You can't even use it as an
> indicator that it might have done.

No, but if you had a good set of stats, you might be able to do something
Bayesian.

--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
x3148