Re: [exim] autoreply vacation complexity troubles

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Wolfgang Hennerbichler
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] autoreply vacation complexity troubles

On 08.05.2007, at 08:57, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:

> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 07:55 +0200, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
>> On 08.05.2007, at 03:07, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
>>> we set $address_data to contain all the attributes for that user
>>> from
>>> LDAP early on.
>>
>> I'd be very intersted in that "early on" stage when it comes to
>> finding out if the user is in the $h_To or $h_CC fields. Could you
>> also give me an example on that one?
>
> we don't do any checking of $h_To: or $h_Cc:, so I'm not sure what
> you're asking here.


so your autoreply will also reply, if the recipient is on bcc.

> anyway, here's the router which sets address_data. it should be your
> first router or thereabouts. our LDAP schema is very non-standard, so
> this is only meant as an illustration.


got you.

> set_address_data:
> driver = redirect
> local_part_suffix = +*
> local_part_suffix_optional
> address_data = ${lookup ldap {LDAP_BASE?\

[snip]

VERY cool approach to save ldap ressources!

I think I got your approach now.
Thanks a lot. I guess my final vacation implementationÎ will
eventually look similar to yours.

> --
> Kjetil T.


wogri

--
www.vix.at // www.aco.net // www.sth.ac.at
wh@??? // WH844-RIPE
Vienna University Computer Center
Tel: +43 1 4277-14031 // Fax: -9140