Re: [exim] More integer annoyances in 4.65

Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 00:22, Wakko Warner wrote:
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to:
> > ${if >{0${spam_score_int}}{50}}
> > ${if >{0${acl_m}}{100}}
>
> It would, if it weren't that $spam_score_int can be negative (and eval doesn't
> like things like "0-" either).
> For $acl_m*, whether they can contain negative numbers obviously depends on
> the administrator.

I didn't think of that.

--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
Got Gas???