Re: [exim] acl_smtp_quit and the spec's suggested purpose

On Nov 16, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Dave Lugo wrote:

>> Maybe that acl should carry some interrogatable status with it that
>> denotes the nature of the "end of conversation", rather than
>> having one
>> specifically for the different cases, then you can conditionalise
>> things
>> with it.
>>
>
> That would make the most sense (adding it to the current quit acl).


How about using ACL_QUIT, but with an $smtp_command of <null>


Brian