Re: [exim] acl_smtp_quit and the spec's suggested purpose

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Dave Lugo wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Philip Hazel wrote:
> >
> > > This doesn't work real well for spammers or other b0rken MTAs that
> > > don't gracefully end the SMTP session. Are there any plans for
> > > an `acl_smtp_left_in_a_huff` or similar?
> >
> > Not that I know of.
> >
>
> Um, could it be added to the wishlist?

Maybe that acl should carry some interrogatable status with it that
denotes the nature of the "end of conversation", rather than having one
specifically for the different cases, then you can conditionalise things
with it.

Jethro.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jethro R Binks
Computing Officer, IT Services
University Of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK