Re: [exim] DynaStop - I like it!

On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 11:25:57PM +0000, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> On 02/11/06, Chris Lightfoot <chris@???> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 11:12:39PM +0000, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> > > On 02/11/06, Chris Lightfoot <chris@???> wrote:
[...]
> > > > I asked about evidence, rather than consensus prejudice,
> > > > for a reason.
> > >
> > > Not sure what your point is.
[...]
> >
> > i.e., no, none.
>
> You have no point? Good, can we move on?

no. I asked, is there any evidence for the implicit theory
of things like Dynastop (i.e., that anybody with whom you
might want to exchange mail is rich enough to pay for some
sort of connectivity that doesn't appear in such a list).
You offered none, but instead offered evidence for a
completely different theory, presumably in the hope that
dimmer readers would mistake it for what I asked for.
(This is the bit of your message which I elided with
[...], above, because it was not relevant to the
discussion.)

As yet no evidence for the theory has been advanced. I
would be genuinely interested to hear some.

--
``In view of the fact that God limited man's intelligence,
it is a pity that He did not also limit his stupidity.'' (Adenauer)