Re: [exim] DynaStop - I like it!

On 02/11/06, Chris Lightfoot <chris@???> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:36:38PM -0600, Mar Matthias Darin wrote:
> > DynaStop specifically identifies dynamic dhcp/dialup IP addresses that in
> > accordance with the many ISPs' AUP/TOS do NOT allow these users to send
> > mail except through the provider's exchange server.
>
> I find this ``everyone competent enough to run a mail
> server can afford a leased line'' theory very attractive.
> Out of interest, is there any evidence for it?
>

Who mentioned a leased line? A hosted VPS or a subscription to an
authenticated mail forwarding service shouldn't break the bank. You're
swimming against the tide in a big way if you're campaigning for the
lifting of port 25 blocks (whether legal or technical).

Peter


--
Peter Bowyer
Email: peter@???