On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
> So, if I stopped doing callouts, and chose to bounce spam instead, that
> wouldn't be a backward step? You'd be no more unhappy for me to fill your
> mailboxes with bounced spam than you are about my callouts?
>
You _could_ instead reject at end-of-DATA.
The result is: no callout performed, and it was really spam,
the connecting trojan/infection is unlikely to bounce the item
back to the forged sender.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lugo dlugo@??? LC Unit #260 TINLC
Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
