On 18 Oct 2006, at 13:42, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
>
> --On 17 October 2006 21:33:42 +0100 Andrew - Supernews
> <andrew@???> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> "Ian" == Ian Eiloart <iane@???> writes:
>>
>> Ian> 3. People using sender verification callouts. They seem to
>> think
>> Ian> it's as bad as sending email,
>>
>> Because ultimately it is.
>
> So, if I stopped doing callouts, and chose to bounce spam instead,
> that
> wouldn't be a backward step? You'd be no more unhappy for me to
> fill your
> mailboxes with bounced spam than you are about my callouts?
>
You would not fill their mail boxes, the dsn would be rejected after
rcpt to: so in fact the session would be indistinguishable from a
callout.
except you will probably retry.
>
> --
> Ian Eiloart
> IT Services, University of Sussex
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
>
