Re: [exim] UCEPROTECT Blacklists and why callouts are abusiv…

Top Pagina
Deze boodschap maakt deel uit van devolgende draad:
M\de volledige draad-boom gesorteerd op datum
MMAndrew - Supernews op <-
.MStuart Gall op ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Auteur: Renaud Allard
Datum:  
Aan: exim-users
Onderwerp: Re: [exim] UCEPROTECT Blacklists and why callouts are abusive


Andrew - Supernews wrote:

>
> (I say "perceived" because I am skeptical about the proportion of spam
> that actually fails callout verification.)
>

The proportion of spam that actually fails callout verification varies
from 10% to 99.99% during peaks...
Deze boodschap werd naar devolgende mailinglijsten gestuurd:
Exim-users
Mailing Lijst Info | Nabije Berichten		<-Re: [exim] conducive.orgRe: [exim] UCEPROTECT Blacklists and why callouts are abusive->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives beheerd door cumin AdminsLurker (versie 2.3)