On 18 Oct 2006, at 04:45, Marten Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> If it hits the end of the routers without
>> matching another then it will bounce back as unrouteable, as it
>> believes
>> it has not matched because it was set as unseen.
>
> right.
>
>> Stuarts suggestion is
>> your best option to make sure all routers are processed (all other
>> routers set us unseen)
>
> Ok, but this means, that the master router at the end of all routers
> needs to have a huge condition combining all conditions of previous
> routers. Have you ever worked with nested and{}s and or{}s? It's a
> pain
> in the a**. Otherwise the last router could simply accept all mail,
> but
> if you are operating a mailserver I hope you aren't doing this,
> because
> then you get flooded with mails from bots, zombie pcs and so on.
You would only need to install an exact copy of all the routers which
have unseen set.
Remove the unseen line
change the transport to redirect
add
allow_balckhole
data = :blackhole:
Thats it no messy and{} or{} anything, you just have to remember when
making changes to do it to both routers, or better make all the
conditions dependent on the same external file
>
> What I need is something that works like "unseen" (so further routers
> are tried), but that remembers if the router has matched and is
> continuing anyway but will accept the message without a final
> master router.
There may be a better way of doing this with transports, but you
would have to post your routers for me to help more
>
> Regards
> Marten
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
>
