Author: Ian Eiloart Date: To: W B Hacker, exim users Subject: Re: [exim] spam acl condition syntax
--On 13 October 2006 19:33:15 +0800 W B Hacker <wbh@???> wrote:
>
> B) Our greatest use of 'message' handshakes are in the acl_smtp_predata
> section, then in the header, size, MIME, ClamAV checking. All well
> before we even consider waking up spamd.
Are you sure about the ClamAV thing? Predata?
> When it comes to the SA scoring area, we either accept unremarked or
> appear to do so, then 'blackhole' unremarked. No moral reqirement to
> tell a spammer *anything* and we simply deliver the rest.
No, but there's a moral requirement to reject rather than blackhole false
positives. There's also a potential legal liability issue.
