Author: Jeremy Harris Date: To: exim-users @ exim. org Subject: Re: [exim] Feature Request - return_path in autoreply
Martin Nicholas wrote: > I would of thought a vacation message would be do the least
> damage if it came from a blackhole, rather than be a bounce. Bounces indicate
> a delivery failure to most mailing systems.
>
> I'd like therefore to be able to set the return_path to something like:
> blackhole@???
>
> Default can still be <> which would ensure compatibility.
>
So, why bother? Why not emit a customized reject message?
