Author: Martin Nicholas Date: To: exim-users Subject: [exim] Feature Request - return_path in autoreply
Setting a "return_path" on the autoreply transport is forbidden on the
grounds that it can cause loops.
I would of thought a vacation message would be do the least
damage if it came from a blackhole, rather than be a bounce. Bounces indicate
a delivery failure to most mailing systems.
I'd like therefore to be able to set the return_path to something like:
blackhole@???
Default can still be <> which would ensure compatibility.
Are there any holes in this argument (blackholes even)?
