I'm also wondering about the "all or nothing" point of view. If you
have a SPF record on the email coming in you check it, if there isn't
you don't and still accept the email? or it gets marked as spam?
Jason Cawood
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [exim] Exim4 + greylistd + spf
> From: "Chris Blaise" <cblaise@???>
> Date: Thu, August 17, 2006 9:46 am
> To: <exim-users@???>
>
> > Personally, I find SPF pretty much useless. Yes, you can use
> > it to score some mail, but implementation is not very
> > widespread, so you either have to go hard-core and reject, or
> > accept the mail anyway, in which case, why bother?
>
> What's "hardcore" about rejecting mail from addresses that are in
> violation of published SPF records?
>
> Chris
>
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
