Re: [exim] [unclassified] Re: return path set in transport, …

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Ian Eiloart
Date:  
To: Magnus Holmgren, exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] [unclassified] Re: return path set in transport, but it doesnt work


--On 5 July 2006 00:29:59 +0200 Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@???>
wrote:

> On Wednesday 05 July 2006 00:04, Marc Haber took the opportunity to write:
>> On 4 Jul 2006 20:57:27 -0000, "Peter Bowyer" <peter@???> did
>>
>> not write:
>> > Please take these amateur home 'server' questions to the Debian exim
>> > mailing list. The exim-users list is for professional mail
>> > administrators, not every student who can boot a Linux distro and
>> > thinks he should run his own 'mail server'.
>>
>> This is another case of anonymous remailer abuse, a Joe Job against
>> Peter.
>
> Always signing one's mail has its advantages.


Really? I have no idea whether your signature is valid. Neither do I have
the inclination to invest any time in discovering whether it is or not.

I suppose I could think of situations in which I would care, but all I ever
got from GPG was a whole bunch of spam because my email address was made
public on a key server. That's 100% of 56 hits for ian at eiloart dot com
on Google, for example.

--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex