Hi !!
>> then the solution could be to do the virus scan at the transport ...
>
> yes, but how?
define one transport that scans the email and reinjects it again in
exim for final delivery (as amavis and other programs do) Myabe you
could take a look a amavis:
http://www.amavis.org/
> And what happens, when a virus is found? Can I define a
> bounce message then?
is really a bad idea to send a bounce message for viruses, almost all
sender addresses are faked and you get the risk to be blacklisted by
other servers.
>> but i also remember that there was a recent topic talking about a way to
>> know at smtp time where each address will be routed (by setting
>> address_data)
>
> In our case this wouldn't help. To know which transport will be used
> doesn't tell if there is a virus scan required after a forwarding (as I
> tried to describe in the forwarding-example).
sorry, i mean routers not transports
> A (very cloddy) way would
> be to do no interal forwardings/redirects,
that's what verify recipient does
> but configure exim to deliver
> forwardings per smtp to itself so that the acl_check_data rule would
> apply. But I don't know if this is possible to configure, I think exim
> will grump that target and sender host is the same.
try amavis
--
Best regards ...
----------------------------------------------------------------
David Saez Padros http://www.ols.es
On-Line Services 2000 S.L. e-mail david@???
Pintor Vayreda 1 telf +34 902 50 29 75
08184 Palau-Solita i Plegamans movil +34 670 35 27 53
----------------------------------------------------------------
