Author: Peter Bowyer Date: To: exim users Subject: Re: [exim] New antispam method (alpha)
On 12/06/06, David Saez Padros <david@???> wrote: > Hi !!
>
> > I would like to see ACL's that can process dynamic addresses with a high
> > level of certainty in not blocking inappropriate IP addresses AND would
> > not overload Exim to a state that would cause it to crawl in performance.
> > I have tested again 350 million IP addresses and can say with a
> > excellent level of certainty that I can minimize blocking inappropriate
> > addresses, including a facility to deliberately exclude specific dynamic
> > IP addresses like sans or sourceforge.
>
> i would never block ALL dinamic ip addresses as there are some people
> running mta's on them from which i want to receive email. Anyway it will
> be difficult that some acl conditions will overload exim, but executing
> a external program on every connection could be a performance problem.
Definitely. I'd rather see this as a daemon which could be called from
Exim with ${readsocket.
