Re: [exim] permanent error if delivery ends with segv

Phil Pennock <exim-users@???> writes:

> On 2006-03-22 at 15:02 +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>> Does this looks good enough/reliable for you ?
>
> The only serious problem is that any Perl going into production use
> really should have warnings turned on. warnings + strict. And taint,
> if dealing with untrusted data. This especially applies when you're
> overriding an error condition to mask a problem!

> I'll also supply the decode logic I typically, which will help you see
> exactly what happened in procmail, so you can get precise logs of all
> failures.

Thanks for the advice and the script, its a really good lesson of perl
usage!

Best regards,
--
Nicolas