Re: [exim] RFC on accepting mail to return path addresses

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Ian Eiloart
Date:  
To: Sander Smeenk, exim-users
CC: 
Subject: Re: [exim] RFC on accepting mail to return path addresses


>
>>> If you do want to, you could set a variable, then test for it in the
>>> PREDATA ACL. If you reject at that point, it won't affect a callout.
>>
>> This is however a nice idea. I might work that out if i find time ;)


Oh, on second thoughts, you probably don't need to set a variable. The
PREDATA ACL has access to the sender and recipient addresses, I think. You
just need to move your test.

>> Thanks,
>> Sander.
>> --
>>| > > Isn't this a stupid question?
>>| > Isn't this a stupid answer?
>>| No, it was another stupid question. This is the stupid answer.
>>| 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D
>
>
>
> --
> Ian Eiloart
> IT Services, University of Sussex




--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex