On 15/03/06, listrcv <listrcv@???> wrote: > Bradley Walker wrote:
>
> > (1) × mleatherland@??? F= R=spamcheck_director T=spamcheck: Child
> > process of spamcheck transport returned 2 from command: /usr/sbin/exim
> > (preceded by transport filter timeout while writing to pipe)
>
> Spamd may eat some gigs(!) of RAM (besides clamad), so the server gets
> into swapping and bogs down. I think that is an issue the devs of
> spamassassin should take care of ...
>
> Meanwhile, since a timeout won't help you, set a size limit on the
> messages that are to be scanned like this:
>
>
> acl_check_data:
This will only help the OP if he moves away from his current
router/transport/spamc mechanism and starts to use the built-in
content scanning facilities.
