On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:06:12 +0100, Florian Weimer <fw@???>
wrote:
>They don't provide Perfect Forwarding Secrecy, so they don't need
>cryptographically strong random numbers. I think using PFS is a
>mistake in this context (because it's too costly, as you've noted),
>but the last time this has come up on debian-devel, the consensus was
>that PFS is important to warrant this inconvenience.
Florian, if you are not dreaming, point me to that conversation on
-devel. PFS has never been explicitly mentioned in the discussions
there.
How do I disable PFS for exim4 linked with GnuTLS?
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
