On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Tom Kistner wrote:
>
> I'm with Tony here: You already can send a username to spamd. Changes in rule
> treatment should be implemented in spamd, using the submitted username as the
> key.
I wasn't thinking of anything user-dependent - and Ian said that he
doesn't want to do that because of the performance implications. Instead,
SpamAssassin should be able to work out that this message is a local
submission and not apply RBL checks to it. SA already has some of this
logic in the notfirsthop stuff for remote submissions; it just needs to be
extended.
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
