Re: [exim] when are exim vars first available? and ...

Dave Lugo wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Philip Hazel wrote:
> >
> > However, if you want to *block* the message on a per-user basis you will
> > have difficulty because a message may have multiple users with different
> > requirements. This problem has been discussed on the list several times
> > (it also applies to, for example, different spam scanning requirements).
> >
> > There is No Easy Answer. The problem is caused by the way SMTP works.
>
>
> Blocking using per user prefs before DATA isn't terribly difficult,
> it's when you start rejecting at end-of-DATA that it gets to the
> No Easy Answer.

How about a fake reject in data acl if some users do not want the message and
some do that states the users who the message did not get delivered to? I
haven't thought it out enough to know if it's a good idea or not. And of
course some servers/clients will butcher the message to mean something else.

--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
Got Gas???