Re: [exim] OT: Abusive mailserver

I'm agree with V.T. Muller ;)

C'est la vie

jonathan ;)

V. T. Mueller wrote:
>
>
> Mark Smith schrieb:
> [..]
>
>> "For your information, our external IT advisers have now adjusted the
>> settings on our server to prevent a recurrence of the issue that you
>> raised
>> - although in their view your comments were pedantic in the extreme
>> and no
>> similar concerns were raised by any other of the recipients of our
>> email."
>>
>> So there's an IT company out there that thinks it's "extremely
>> pedantic" to
>> expect mailservers not to ignore 550 errors.
>> I really wish there was a way to keep people like this off the
>> Internet. Or
>> was I indeed just being "extremely pedantic"?
>
>
>
> No, you were not extremely pedantic. It's always the same story: company
> A orders company B for service C because they don't want to hire someone
> for the job permanently. In fact, A don't really want to spend much
> money for C. So it's likely that B does a rather dirty job.
> Now you come in and tell A there's s/th broken in C. Then A will ask B.
> Just wonder what B will tell - "sorry I made a lousy job"? B will tell A
> exactly what you report above.
>
> Smile about it, forget it, and enjoy the weekend!
>
> Cheers,
> vt
>