Re: [exim] SMTP protocol violation?

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Peter Bowyer wrote:

> A recent thread on SPAM-L discussed how useful this technique is, in
> conjunction with a delayed 220 banner as entrapment.

It occurs to me that if you're the target of other people's
verification callouts, then you might find you embarrass yourself by
waiting too long at that stage of the procedure.