On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Fred Viles wrote:
>
> Was there possibly a line consisting of '.' following the "Test
> message" line in the original message?
>
> Is it possible Exchange is not dot-stuffing the message body?? Seems
> hard to believe, but it would explain it.
>
It's not hard to believe, at all.
As I understand it, Exchange on NT 4.0 (whatever version of exchange
it is, I forget), originally shipped with dot-stuffing[1] busted.
[1] I assume by 'dot-stuffing', you mean prepending a '.' to any
lines that start with a '.', so the receiving MTA can strip the
extra '.'
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lugo dlugo@??? LC Unit #260 TINLC
Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
