Re: [exim] Message size checks on spam ACLs

Marc Sherman wrote:
> The problems being reported are with the exiscan case. With exiscan,
> exim is sending the data directly to spamd over a socket, so exim has to
> implement the limiting logic to keep the data from getting to
> spamassassin in the first place.

I don't agree. Just sending that much data, while inefficient,
surely isn't costing as much as scanning it within spamd.

- Jeremy