Re: [exim] delay_warning

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Nathan Ollerenshaw
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] delay_warning
On May 19, 2005, at 7:18 PM, Tony Finch wrote:

> On Thu, 19 May 2005, Nathan Ollerenshaw wrote:
>
>> On May 16, 2005, at 3:59 PM, Nathan Ollerenshaw wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I have delay_warning set to 4h:8h:24h but a customer reported
>>> that they did
>>> not get a delay warning email for a message they sent. The
>>> message was
>>> delivered (to a local mailbox, it was full) after about 20 hours,
>>> so they
>>> should have seen two warning messages, but they didn't.
>>>
>>
>> Anyone have any ideas on this? Or should I chalk this one up as "I
>> don't
>> know"?
>>
>
> Perhaps it is due to this default setting:
>
>       delay_warning_condition = \
>         ${if match{$h_precedence:}{(?i)bulk|list|junk}{no}{yes}}


Hadn't considered that, but looking at the copy of the message I
have, nope. There is no precedence header set.

Regards,

Nathan.

--
Nathan Ollerenshaw / Systems Engineer
Systems Engineering
ValueCommerce Co., Ltd.

Tokyo Bldg 4F 3-32-7 Hongo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 113-0033 Japan
Tel. +81.3.3817.8995 Fax. +81.3.3812.4051
mailto:nathan@valuecommerce.co.jp

"It must be remembered that there is nothing more difficult
to plan, more doubtful of success nor more dangerous to
manage than the creation of a new system. For the initiator
has the enmity of all who profit by the preservation of the
old institution and merely lukewarm defenders in those who
would gain by the new one." - Nicolo Machiavelli