On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> Times have changed. Perhaps the best plan now would be *never* to give
> any details in bounce and delay warning messages. What do people think?
I think we need to distinguish between deliberate failures (nonexistent
email address) and the result of a cock-up. In the former case more
information is better. The latter usually produces a 4xx, which should not
include embarrasing details.
Are there any examples of embarrasing 5xx error messages?
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
