On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Marilyn Davis wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Fred Viles wrote:
>
> > On 23 Mar 2005 at 11:51, Marilyn Davis wrote about
> > "Re: [exim] Heads up?":
> >
> > | On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Mike Wiebeld wrote:
> > |
> > | > Marilyn,
> > | > :)
> > | > Please don't take this the wrong way, I just found it humorous.
> > | >
> > | > http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html
> > |
> > | Cute.
> > |... (but...)
> >
> > dont-get-no-respect-6
> > Nothing in this list applies to your solution to the spam
> > problem except some entries that are neither ironic nor silly.
> >
> > | The ones where you have to go to the web and read a hard-to-OCR font
> > | aren't vulnerable to robot attack -- if done right.
> >
> > They are vulnerable to the problem that a significant fraction of
> > legitimate senders won't be willing to jump through the hoop. Duh,
> > as you would say.
> >
> > And your FUSSP still needs a *viable* solution to the spoofed
> > address/collateral spam problem. SPF is not it.
>
> No? I guess I don't understand SPF then. Can you please explain?
Never mind. I'm studying
http://spf.pobox.com.
>
> Marilyn
>
> >
> > - Fred
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
