On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Fred Viles wrote:
> On 23 Mar 2005 at 11:51, Marilyn Davis wrote about
> "Re: [exim] Heads up?":
>
> | On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Mike Wiebeld wrote:
> |
> | > Marilyn,
> | > :)
> | > Please don't take this the wrong way, I just found it humorous.
> | >
> | > http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html
> |
> | Cute.
> |... (but...)
>
> dont-get-no-respect-6
> Nothing in this list applies to your solution to the spam
> problem except some entries that are neither ironic nor silly.
>
> | The ones where you have to go to the web and read a hard-to-OCR font
> | aren't vulnerable to robot attack -- if done right.
>
> They are vulnerable to the problem that a significant fraction of
> legitimate senders won't be willing to jump through the hoop. Duh,
> as you would say.
>
> And your FUSSP still needs a *viable* solution to the spoofed
> address/collateral spam problem. SPF is not it.
No? I guess I don't understand SPF then. Can you please explain?
Marilyn
>
> - Fred
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
