Tom, would it be right to declare ACL_WHERE_MIME unconditionally? If you
compile the code currently in CVS without CONTENT_SCAN then it blows up.
The patch below fixes the problem.
gcc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium -I. acl.c
acl.c:496: `ACL_WHERE_MIME' undeclared here (not in a function)
acl.c:496: initializer element is not constant
acl.c:496: (near initialization for `control_forbids[5]')
acl.c:501: `ACL_WHERE_MIME' undeclared here (not in a function)
acl.c:501: initializer element is not constant
acl.c:501: (near initialization for `control_forbids[6]')
acl.c:517: `ACL_WHERE_MIME' undeclared here (not in a function)
acl.c:517: initializer element is not constant
acl.c:517: (near initialization for `control_forbids[8]')
*** Error code 1
--- src/macros.h 17 Feb 2005 11:58:26 -0000 1.9
+++ src/macros.h 9 Mar 2005 16:32:59 -0000
@@ -745,10 +746,7 @@
enum { ACL_WHERE_RCPT, /* Some controls are for RCPT only */
ACL_WHERE_MAIL, /* ) */
ACL_WHERE_PREDATA, /* ) There are several tests for "in message", */
- /* ) implemented by <= WHERE_NOTSMTP */
-#ifdef WITH_CONTENT_SCAN /* ) */
- ACL_WHERE_MIME, /* ) */
-#endif /* ) */
+ ACL_WHERE_MIME, /* ) implemented by <= WHERE_NOTSMTP */
ACL_WHERE_DATA, /* ) */
ACL_WHERE_NOTSMTP, /* ) */
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
