Re: [exim] SPF acl condition not recognized

David Woodhouse wrote:

> There are indeed. Some are generally backed up by references to fact and
> explanations of how mail actually works in the real world. The opposing
> view is generally just "It's my right to break my mail", and "But <xxxx>
> is doing it so it must be sane".
>
> I'd like to _not_ see that final sentence with 'Exim' in it where
> '<xxxx>' used to be.

That's why it has an EXPERIMENTAL_ #ifdef prefix in 4.50. If SPF goes
downhill the code can be removed in 10 minutes without leaving a trace.
If the world elects to use SPF, no matter how stupid it is, exim will
support it. That is called pragmatism :)

Speaking of EXPERIMENTAL, I have DomainKeys support ready. I'll make a
snapshot package next week.

/tom