Re: [exim] BATV implementation?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Marc Sherman
Date:  
To: David Woodhouse
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] BATV implementation?
David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> See http://david.woodhou.se/eximconf/include/routers-ses and the
> slightly older version and explanation at http://woodhou.se/rpr.html
>
> It predates BATV so doesn't precisely match the format of localparts it
> uses, but it does basically the same thing.


Thanks! I suppose it shouldn't be so hard to modify the localparts
format, or change it to use the same domain with a ${if match...}
precondition.

Have you been using it for very long, and have you found it effective?
Any problems you've noticed, such as receiving sites that don't like the
munged envelope-from?

I think I'd modify it to teergrube and add a header which Spamassassin
would score harshly, rather than reject, for my site.

In the rpr.html version, there's a comment at the top of the config:
# Urgh. Isn't there a better way to detect that we're in sender
# verification?
# -- This will apparently be fixed in Exim 4.31

What was that referring to? I'll assume it was fixed, since I couldn't
find a similar block in the routers-ses part.

Thanks,
- Marc